Thursday, January 15, 2026

Q&A with Svetlana Satchkova

 

Photo by Dasha Murashka

 

 

Svetlana Satchkova is the author of the new novel The Undead. She was born in Russia and moved to the United States in 2016.  

 

Q: What inspired you to write The Undead, and how did you create your character Maya?

 

A: I started with the story of a friend of mine from Moscow who, like Maya, gave up journalism in favor of film school. She was considered a genius there and began filming her debut feature straight out of graduate school.

 

But after the filming was complete, something strange happened: her producer began stalling on the project’s completion without ever explaining why. Then, after two years, it became clear that the film would never be finished.

 

This was a personal tragedy for her. She has never written or filmed anything since, watching her former classmates go on to make impressive careers in film. I wanted to explore this story, which felt rich with questions about who succeeds in art and the roles luck, determination, and talent play in that process.

 

As I was writing, though, I kept thinking about how this friend, along with many other people I knew in Moscow, remained completely apolitical, choosing to ignore what was happening around them as the Russian state grew more repressive and the space for personal freedom continued to shrink.

 

I couldn’t understand this attitude, having grown so afraid of the direction the regime was taking that I chose to leave my birth country for good.

 

While I was working on the novel, a high-profile political trial took place in Russia: two women, Zhenya Berkovich and Svetlana Petryichuk, were prosecuted ostensibly for a play they had staged, but in reality for their oppositional political views. I realized that I wanted to write about this as well, and their story became part of Maya’s story.

 

The novel ultimately explores the dangers creative people face under an authoritarian regime and the different strategies they adopt in an attempt to keep themselves safe.

 

Q: How was the novel’s title chosen, and what does it signify for you?

 

A: It occurred to me almost immediately, once I realized that Maya would be making a zombie movie. But the title also functions as a metaphor, which many early readers have picked up on right away.

 

For me, it signifies everyone living under Putin’s regime, who, of necessity, exist in a kind of half-alive state, willfully numbing themselves to the atrocities the government commits and to the compromises one has to make with one’s conscience in order to participate in the system at all—sometimes even taking money from the regime while still thinking of oneself as a decent person.

 

Q: The writer Julia Phillips said of the book, “This novel, hilarious, disturbing, and remarkable, shows us Russia and America, the personal and the political, what's happening now and what's waiting in the darkness ahead.” What do you think of that description?

 

A: In The Undead, I was trying to tell a very specific story set in a particular place and time, without consciously drawing parallels to what’s happening in America. But as it has become increasingly clear, such parallels can indeed be drawn.

 

I also wanted the novel to be entertaining and accessible, rather than dense or tedious, as books that take on dark subjects sometimes are. I hope I succeeded, though that’s not really for me to decide.

 

Q: Did you know how the novel would end before you started writing it, or did you make many changes along the way?

 

A: I had no idea how it would end. As I mentioned, I began with the story of my friend, the filmmaker, whose experience offered no real resolution. It was a story of someone who had given up, not especially uplifting, and not even one in which the protagonist learns something through the journey.

 

Early on, I told myself, “I’ll figure something out,” because it was clear to me that fiction is different from life and that, for the novel to work, I would need to invent a more satisfying ending.

 

As I kept writing, however, the book took on a political dimension, and an entirely different plotline and ending presented themselves.

 

Q: What are you working on now?

 

A: I’m working on another novel set in Russia. It will be more sweeping in terms of time, spanning roughly 20 years. It’s also more challenging for me, as it explores a milieu I’m not familiar with and therefore requires a great deal of research. The book will be longer as well. I’m still in the early stages, having written three chapters out of what will likely be 10 or more.

 

Q: Anything else we should know?

 

A: I’ve noticed that not everyone understands the humor in The Undead, or perhaps the idea that one can write about serious, heavy subjects and still laugh in the process. This may be cultural.

 

Recently, at a doctor’s appointment, our conversation somehow turned to his residency years. He told me about a fellow resident who would laugh or joke whenever something terrible happened, and he couldn’t understand what was wrong with her.

 

I explained that laughter can be one of the most effective coping strategies, and that there’s a rich Eastern European literary tradition of humor that grapples with the heaviest subjects imaginable: war, hunger, death.

 

I wasn’t consciously drawing on that tradition while writing The Undead, but I think I’m participating in it simply by virtue of having been born and raised in that culture.

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb 

Q&A with Emma R. Alban

 


 

Emma R. Alban is the author of the new novel Like in Love with You. Her other books include Don't Want You Like a Best Friend. She lives in Los Angeles. 

 

Q: What inspired you to write Like in Love with You, and how did you create your characters Catherine and Rosalie?

 

A: As I was brainstorming my next book, my Dad and I were having a lot of fun trading comp ideas, in the “It’s THIS meets THIS” format. Some were ridiculous, some were hilarious, and a few…will hit shelves in this decade.

 

One of the combos I tossed up was Mean Girls meets Northanger Abbey, because Mean Girls The Musical The Movie had just dropped.

 

As I watched it, I was struck by how many of the high school clique dynamics map onto the Marriage Market, but that you’d get two levels in the Ton, with the debutantes, and their mothers, with infinitely higher adult stakes for everyone.

 

As soon as I started swirling that around in my head, Catherine and Rosalie just walked right up. Catherine as a fish-out-of-water in her first Season in Bath, UK. Rosalie as the resident mean girl, but with a dwindling group of friends, with most everyone she knows having been married off. And their mothers, with a past and vendettas of their own. 

 

How Catherine and Rosalie would react to being pitted against one another provided infinite story ideas, as did knowing they’d slowly become more and more attracted to each other across the season. The whole concept was deeply inspiring, and it made for very easy outlining, because everything was just sort of there from the get-go in the idea.  

 

Q: Can you say more about the “Mean Girls meets Northanger Abbey” idea?

 

A: So, Like in Love with You is about two debutantes who are forced to fight over the same (lackluster) man by their feuding mothers, and slowly come to realize they’d rather be fighting for each other, instead. 

 

Catherine is new to Bath (an homage to Catherine from Northanger Abbey), trying to make her way in the social season, when her mother realizes her arch-nemesis is still there, and her daughter, Lady Rosalie, is the jewel of the town, and soon-to-be-engaged to the most eligible bachelor of the season.  So, naturally, Catherine’s mother decides they need to sabotage Lady Rosalie’s relationship. 

 

Catherine’s initially on board, until she gets taken in by Lady Rosalie’s magnetic charm, wit, and scary mean girl wiles. Lady Rosalie’s determined to win her suitor, Mr. Dean, but finds that no matter how aloof she wants to be, Catherine’s going to tear down her defenses one smile at a time.

 

With every competition over Mr. Dean, they fall harder for each other than for him. If only their mothers would give up the fight…

 

Q: So what role do you see Mr. Dean playing in the novel?

 

A: Oh, Mr. Dean. He just wants to talk about his world tour and play cards.

 

As soon as I came up with the conceit of two debutantes being forced to fight over a man, I became deeply in love with the idea of that man just being so very, very blah. I wanted him to be a prize in title only.

 

He’s a nothing-burger of a person, with a very handsome face, which might have been “enough” for Catherine or Rosalie if they had never met each other, but as soon as they do, he serves as a catalyst for them to realize what they don’t want, and start looking to find a way to keep what they do. 

 

Q: How was the book’s title chosen, and what does it signify for you?

 

A: When I sent the first draft to my editor, I had tentatively titled it “Not Your Mother’s Marriage Market.” But we decided as a team that it wasn’t the right fit.

 

I knew l wanted a title that was a playful nod to Regina George. Renee Rapp had just dropped “It’s Not My Fault,” which uses the line from Mean Girls, “you’re like in love with me.”

 

And I thought Like in Love with You would be a playful nod to that song, as well as a statement about what you’re about to read: historical romance, with a modern flare, a Mean Girls vibe, and some delightful catty behavior. 

 

Q: What are you working on now?

 

A: I’m just finishing up edits on a soon-to-be-announced project, and am about to dive into edits for my next historical romance with Avon, coming Winter 2027 (another rivals-to-lovers story, but with a…swapping twist). Very excited to dive back in!

 

Q: Anything else we should know?

 

A: Like in Love with You is available in paperback, ebook, and audiobook (narrated by the fantastic Mary Jane Wells and Morag Sims). If you’re in LA, NYC, or DC, I’ll be doing book events over the next two weeks, and would love to see you!

 

January 16, The Ripped Bodice LA

January 21, The Ripped Bodice Brooklyn

January 22, East City Bookshop, DC

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb. Here's a previous Q&A with Emma R. Alban. 

Q&A with Janell Strube

 


 

 

Janell Strube is the author of the new novel Adélaïde: Painter of the Revolution

 

Q: What inspired you to write a novel based on the life of artist Adélaïde Labille-Guiard (1749-1803)?

 

A: There are two answers to this question. The first would be that I was researching the life of another artist from the era to write about her, and I came across this phrase that went something like this, “By that time her works had long gone up to flames.” How could I not solve this crime against art? I had to find out what happened.


The longer answer might be the universe calling. In 1985 I asked an art history professor why he wasn’t teaching us about female artists, and he said, “No woman has contributed meaningfully to the arts.” That was the last art history class I took in college; I decided not to double major in English and Art History and graduated from college a year early.

 

Ironically, this was said about female artists in the fierce fight to keep Adélaïde and Élisabeth Vigée Lebrun out of the Royal Academy.

 

I think these women called me to tell their story.

 

Q: What did you see as the right balance between history and fiction as you wrote the book?

 

A: In my first drafts, I stayed true to history, or history as I could find and research it. A Hollywood producer at a writers’ festival advised me not to be a slave to history. Once I knew what my themes were, that is where I used fiction to support my story.

 

I used the historical words and actions of the real people I included in the story to drive their characters, but I used fictional characters and scenes to elucidate the anger, fear, danger, and losses that the women of this time experienced.

 

I think that the most important lesson I had to learn (or show I had learned), was to realize I was not writing a biography, but rather that I was dramatizing an era and a woman whose work and legacy had been forgotten. I put myself in her head and lived her life within the lens of my own experience – that is where the fiction really comes in.

 

Q: How did you research the novel, and what did you learn that especially surprised you?

 

A: I read A LOT of art history textbooks and books about the ancient regime and the French revolution (perhaps 40 books in all), even books on architecture, plumbing and central heat and the things that people left behind in their wills. There was only one book about the art of Adélaïde at that time, although she appeared throughout the other books.

 

I visited art museums with her work, the work of others, and I walked the streets of Paris where buildings that she would have visited still existed and studied many paintings that reflected life of that time.

 

I’m an accountant, so I prepared a giant spreadsheet of timelines of the people involved and when I found intersections – like a grand party or some other event, I would go looking in biographies to confirm who was there. This was really fun and gave me great insight.

 

Q: What do you see as Labille-Guiard's legacy today?

 

A: I think she gets a new legacy today because there is a new spotlight on her.

 

In her time, after the revolution, she was not even allowed to paint under her own name. As a person, she fought hard for what she believed was right and it may have cost her her health, her all. In one of my versions, I write about her heart breaking.

 

She left a legacy in her studio of amazing female artists, yet they did not get the privileges she fought for them to have. It would take another century for women to take their place again in French art.

 

Today she stands as a thoroughly modern woman who looks to show us the effort that women have made and must continue to make to take their rightful place in arts, letters, science, math, business, global leadership.

 

She also points us back to Greek times where philosophers worried about the same issue, and she points us to the future and what is possible for women to achieve when they don’t listen to the narrative society feeds them.

 

Q: What are you working on now?

 

A: I have two ongoing projects – one a memoir about growing up biracial and adopted into a white family in the 1960s, and I am beginning my second historical novel about two of the characters that appears in Adélaïde: Painter of the Revolution. And then, because I am a poet, I get “distracted” into poetry all the time – but that’s a good thing.

 

Q: Anything else we should know?

 

A: Adélaïde: Painter of the Revolution comes out just before the 250th anniversary of France closing the guilds. This one act cost the 130 female artists of Paris the ability to work in their profession.

 

A lot of events in the French Revolution have their parallels today. Adélaïde Labille Guiard and her achievements were deliberately erased in her time, and we see the same happening now with women and people of color.

 

I think that historical fiction has a place to illuminate the issues of today through the microscope applied to the efforts of people of yesterday. Not only does it preserve their history, but it can reveal something about our own time.

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb 

Q&A with Kate King

 

Photo by Jewel Afflerbaugh

 

Kate King is the author of the new book Mend or Move On: A Guide to Healing or Leaving Toxic Relationships. She is a therapist, and her other books include The Radiant Life Project

 

Q: What inspired you to write Mend or Move On?

 

A: It is no secret that the collective seems to be alight with controversy on the topics of no contact and estrangement.

 

As a clinician, my prerogative is to take a systemic perspective on the topic, meaning that I perceive the relational struggles many people are moving through as being related to longstanding beliefs, patterns, and messages stemming from their family of origin.

 

As adults, many people come to realize that certain relationships they thought would be in their lives forever actually have wildly unhealthy undercurrents that must be brought into the light.

 

It is at this juncture that many people consider the difficult question of whether the relationship that feels both important and also harmful can be healed, or if it must be ended.

 

Mend or Move On is the culmination of my nearly 20 years in clinical practice as a psychotherapist and decades of personal experience living within a profoundly toxic, dysfunctional family of origin that led me to finally choose estrangement with certain family members I could not find healthy repair with.

 

As I navigated my own healing layers through the years, I encountered research and psychological information surrounding family estrangement and relational dysfunction that led me to further clinical training on the topic to support the many clients who came to me with relational issues like this.

 

I knew eventually I would write a therapeutic guide on this topic, but I waited to write this book until the grief, confusion, and pain of my own familial estrangement was healed to the extent where I could guide others without my projections and unhealed material getting in the way.

 

It is my hope that the personal and clinical work infused in the pages of Mend or Move On will be a guiding light for those who may be at the difficult, perplexing choice point between whether to stay or go in relationships that have caused a great deal of pain and suffering for them.

 

Q: How would you define a toxic relationship, and what would you say are some of the most common perceptions and misconceptions about them?

 

A: At the beginning of Mend or Move On I share dictionary definitions as well as my own definitions to help my readers gain clarity about what “toxic” really means.

 

My definition of “toxic relationship” is as follows: “A connection between individuals that promotes disease, unwellness, and/or trauma due to its harmful qualities to the mind, body, heart, or soul. Participants may be toxic in their behaviors, personalities, or qualities, or the dynamic itself may have become toxic without necessitating toxicity in personalities of the participants themselves outside of the bond.”

 

One of the common misperceptions about toxic relationships is that people often label a person or a relationship as being “toxic” when in fact it is only misaligned.

 

Not every relationship that’s not working is toxic. Simple incongruity is also possible, and there can be seasons where a relationship is meant to last, and others where it is healthiest for it to end. That can happen even if a relationship lacks toxicity.

 

To help readers discern, I share three qualities that are present in toxic relationships—if your relationship has one or all of these qualities, it would, in my definition, qualify as toxic:

 

Consistency and persistence: The harmful, dysfunctional behavior is not a one-off experience. It happens regularly in an ongoing fashion.

 

Truly harmful to the mind and body: The relationship dynamic is abusive, intrusive, cruel, and painful in the way it harms you. It’s more than an irritation or annoyance.

 

Twisty-turny, Pushy-pully: Excuse my non-clinical terminology, but this one is hard to explain. It’s the visceral experience of a person’s body reacting to relational toxicity. There’s a tension, an internally sick feeling, a push-pull discomfort that can manifest differently for everyone.

 

Another common misperception about toxic relationships is that people believe they can heal the relationship alone even if their counterpart refuses to change. This often happens with a person who takes false ownership over the entirety of the relational discord, believing that if only they can find the magical ingredient, everything will be better.

 

Toxic relationships don’t heal like that. In my belief and experience, repair and healing can only happen if the toxicity between people ceases to exist through their individual and shared inner work.

 

Both people must work to heal the trauma that contributes to the dysfunction, look honestly at themselves and one another to discern the roots of the issue, and get curious about how the dynamic has developed unhealthy patterns of behavior between them. Without mutual commitment to healing, I have not seen healthy repair be possible.

 

Q: How was the book’s title chosen, and what does it signify for you?

 

A: To honor the delicacy of this topic, I wanted to be very clear with my book that I am not encouraging estrangement as a fix-all for any relationship that feels imperfect or misaligned.

 

Rather, I chose the title Mend or Move On so readers would know that they always have a choice, they are never stuck, and different circumstances fit into both the “mend” and the “move on” buckets.

 

This book is full of the nuance and complexity related to the topic of dysfunctional, toxic relationships. It is not a one-size-fits-all guide to slashing all relationships down with a machete.

 

Instead, it asks readers to take a deeper look into themselves, the people they choose to connect with, and the patterns and behaviors of their lives that may contribute to co-creating relationship dynamics that harm them.

 

I speak about the “mend or move on choice point” as a fork in the road where readers get to make a profound, empowered choice: re-commit to the relationship by digging into efforts for repair, or acknowledge the toxicity in the connection and choose to end it with dignity and respect for all involved.

 

Q: What impact did it have on you to write this book, and what do you hope readers take away from it?

 

A: I absolutely loved writing this book. It felt like it streamed through me. In my heart of hearts I believe that everyone deserves to be treated with kindness, respect, and compassion in their relationships – especially in the most intimate, vulnerable connections.

 

Writing about how to discern healthy from unhealthy, toxic from misaligned… it feels like important work in this modern era where so many people are digging deep and working on their personal growth.

 

In my own life, the impact of healing my relational wounds from my family of origin and bundling the pearls of wisdom I’ve learned into this book has been incredibly impactful for me.

 

It makes me feel empowered and motivated to continue supporting the movement towards positive self-worth and inner strength in everyone. These are complex topics, but I truly believe the collective is ready.

 

My hope is that readers also feel empowered and strong, finding these qualities within themselves as they navigate their most challenging relationships and ultimately move towards peace and freedom.

 

For many, leaving toxic relationships can be the fight of their life. For me it certainly was. I hope readers in such an experience derive support and sustenance from my book that positively contributes to their journey, regardless of whether they ultimately decide to “mend” or “move on.”

 

Q: What are you working on now?

 

A: As an entrepreneur I always have projects in the works, but currently bringing Mend or Move On into the world is the work I feel most excited about. I am enjoying having meaningful conversations on various podcasts, speaking on live TV nationwide, and continuing to write and teach this powerful, life-transforming work.

 

Q: Anything else we should know?

 

A: Relationships are complex and imperfect. It is important that we all respect that perfection is not the goal, and imperfection does not doom a relationship to failure.

 

The truth lies somewhere in the messy territory of doing your best when it comes to expressing your needs, supporting a reciprocal give-and-take, and leaning-in for repair when your relationship bobbles; this means getting more comfortable with setting boundaries, communicating in healthy ways, navigating apologies and forgiveness, and offering one another grace.

 

Even if a person chooses to end a relationship, it doesn’t mean that they need to feel hateful or hold on to resentment. Just as repair is imperfect, cutting contact also has its wiggly bits—and that’s ok.

 

We must all practice being kind to ourselves as we navigate the tricky terrain of improving and repairing relationships, and the equally challenging work of ending them. I hope readers will offer themselves the patience and internal support that bolsters and elevates them, even as they dig deep into this sometimes uncomfortable work.

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb 

Jan. 15

 


 

ON THIS DAY IN HISTORY
Jan. 15, 1929: Martin Luther King Jr. born.

Wednesday, January 14, 2026

Q&A with Jenna Blum

 

Photo by Janna Giacoppo

 

 

Jenna Blum is the author of the new novel Murder Your Darlings. Her other books include Those Who Save Us. She is based in Boston. 

 

Q: What inspired you to write Murder Your Darlings, and how did you create your cast of characters?

A: I’ve long been inspired by the question: what makes a woman who has a fulfilling career and a great community–a good life, in other words–go to extreme lengths in pursuit of love? Especially when that love may or may not be too good to be true.

 

Sam Vetiver, the protagonist of Murder Your Darlings, has additional pressures: she’s a mid-life author facing lukewarm book sales and recovering from a divorce, so when a very successful and charismatic male author parachutes into her world, she really goes down the rabbit hole to chase the relationship and find her identity eroded in the process.

I feel like we all know women with codependency behaviors and/or have been these women–I certainly have!…so I wanted to write this book for them and for myself.

 

Setting it within the publishing industry was the icing; I’ve been a career writer since I was 16, and I’ve loved unpacking the details of this weird, wonderful life for readers.

Q: The writer Joseph Finder said of the book, “Is it wrong to call a serial killer novel fun? Because Murder Your Darlings is great fun—a delicious satire of the writing life as well as a genuinely gripping thriller.” What do you think of that description?

A: I love it! My favorite word here is “delicious.” That’s exactly the experience I hope all readers have reading Murder Your Darlings: that they devour it like an ice cream sandwich that you eat in one sitting because it’s so delicious you can’t stop. And don’t we all need some fun? 

Q: Did you know how the novel would end before you started writing it, or did you make many changes along the way?

A: I always know how my novels will end–in fact, I know the final sentences, so I write toward that finish line.

 

What changed along the way in Murder Your Darlings is that I thought it would be narrated by Sam and the novel’s stalker, The Rabbit, all the way through, in alternating chapters.

 

But William Corwyn, Sam’s stratospherically successful author lover, jumped in to narrate Part 2, and I was delighted: his perspective gives the novel a huge bolt of dark electricity.

Q: What do you think the novel says about the publishing world?

A: I intended Murder Your Darlings as a love letter to this industry I’ve been working in since my teens. Certainly my agent and editor, who are portrayed in the novel exactly as they are, see it this way (they faux-squabble over who’s the most important).

 

I also pulled no punches and spared no details of what the writer’s life is really like; I think people often imagine writers sit on doghouses like Snoopy and write “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times,” and everything just flows from there, but it’s much more of a rollercoaster.

 

There are huge ups and downs and smaller joys and paper cuts in between, and it’s a rewarding and perilous way to live. I’m honored to have had a chance to share that.

Q: What are you working on now?

A: I’ve got three thrillers in the pipeline after Murder Your Darlings, so I’m developing those ideas before I go on tour in January 2026–that way I’ll have them to write when I return!

Q: Anything else we should know?

A: Murder Your Darlings has been optioned by Rohm Feifer entertainment! So please keep your fingers crossed we’ll soon see it as a film or series. And the BIGGEST thank you to my readers. Murder Your Darlings, as you’ll see, is a love letter to you, too. 

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb 

Q&A with Grant Faulkner

 



 

 


 

 

Grant Faulkner is the author of the new book something out there in the distance. His other books include The Art of Brevity. He cohosts the Write-minded podcast, is the cofounder of the journal 100 Word Story, and is an executive producer for the show America's Next Great Author.  

 

Q: What inspired you to write something out there in the distance?

 

A: I’ve been writing flash fiction—little snapshots of life—for the last 15 years or so. I’m also a photographer. I’ve been interested in the interaction between text and image for years, which is one reason we couple all of the stories we publish on 100wordstory.org with an image and also offer a monthly photo prompt.

 

When I think of my life, I think of it as a collage of snapshots. This book allowed me to portray these small, fleeting, but arresting moments of life through the characters of Dawn and Jonny through my good friend Gail Butensky’s photos.

 

It’s a love story. It’s a death story. It’s a road trip story. I love writing about tragic love. So much of love is tragic in the end.

 

Q: How did you and Gail Butensky collaborate on the project, and what do you think her photographs add to the book?

 

A: Oh, Gail’s photos are at the center of the book. They’re the genesis of the book. We waited tables together back in the early ‘90s, and I’ve always admired her photos and her overall aesthetic.

 

She gave me 30 or so photos to write tiny stories to, and I found each photo to be so full of stories, so full of possibilities.

 

Even though the stories are short, the stories coupled with the photos make the book expansive, so it can feel like a novel or a film. Gail and I share an obsession with the Southwest and road trips through the desert.

 

I call it a “flash novel.” I just love the way her photos and the stories weave in and out of each other. It’s a unique reading experience.

 

Q: How did you create your characters Dawn and Jonny, and how would you describe their relationship?

 

A: I like writing about love. I like writing about desperate characters. I like writing about lost characters. I like writing about characters who are smart but might not be school smart. I like writing about characters who are most comfortable when they’re unanchored from life, when they’re drifting. That’s when I’m most comfortable.

 

Jonny is devoted to Dawn. Dawn is devoted to Jonny in her way, but she’s also got a will and a drive that makes her naturally elusive. She’s strong and she doesn’t want to be weak, even though her cancer is making her weak. She’s always been able to run away from her problems, so that’s her natural inclination.

 

Jonny wants her to be happy. He wants to care for her. Even though he knows he can’t really make her happy and can’t really care for her. That’s the definition of tragedy.

 

Q: How was the book’s title chosen, and what does it signify for you?

 

A: The title comes from the first photo in the book. A woman is walking up a hill in the distance. She’s barely visible, somewhat similar to an Andrew Wyeth painting.

 

And that relates to Jonny's loss of Dawn, the way she recedes into the distance despite his efforts to keep her present, the way the landscape makes them smaller and less significant, the way death itself is out there in the distance. So much of life is something out there in the distance.

 

Q: What are you working on now?

 

A: I am working on two things: a final revision of my novel, The Letters, which delves into the nature of being haunted by love, tracing the paradoxes of loss and obsession that Roland Barthes explored so poetically in A Lover’s Discourse.

 

I’m also working on a memoir related to some heart problems that I have. I’m excavating my general tendency toward excess and being a maniac in a variety of ways, and how different health problems have spoken to me at different points in my life, and how I listened or didn’t listen to them.

 

Q: Anything else we should know?

 

A: Sign up for my weekly newsletter on Substack, Intimations: A Writer’s Discourse—it’s free!

 

Also, submit stories to 100 Word Story and sign up for classes at the Flash Fiction Institute, my new venture.

 

But … I’ll add that I want to write more books like this. This is my favorite book of all that I’ve written. I love writing to photographs, thinking of the world as a series of photographs.

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb